Thursday, August 14, 2008

The Little Engine That Could...

 

 "I think I can....I think I can....I think I can"....

We have all read those words in the children's book of "the Little Engine that Could", it's a story of perseverance and believing in yourself. Sometimes though in real life, that little locomotive engine becomes more than what it is,...it becomes a huge conglomerate, a corporation, an entity unto it's self.

The other day my mom gave me a booklet she had received in the mail and wanted me to look up the information on-line and explain to her just what the booklet was about. I delved into the book and googled the website url given in the book/pamphlet that was listed and read up a little on the material. It has to do with a case trying to be settled out of court by the optic fiber cable companies and landowners with property they may have next to a railroad where fiber optic cable was buried.

Pretty boring and mundane stuff I thought at first glance, but I have to admit the more I read on the website and booklet the more intrigued ....and incensed I got.

Years and years ago, the railroad was built on "corridors" of private land and were given easements on the properties for the maintaining and running of their railroad. The Fiber Optic Cable company in an agreement with the railroads, proceeded to bury their cables on the railroad's easement in order to bypass all of the landholders it would have required to garner permission from to bury the cables. Hence a class action suit was filed by a private landowner, that later lumped all landowners within this case.

Pretty sneaky when you think about it.

Now unless you were born in the 1800's, chances are any railroad corridors were already cut and dried years ago....Easements were obtained and the railroad acquired rights in that easement. Just think of the untold amounts of money they would be able to obtain for letting whichever companies they decide to use those easements. You may own the original property, pay taxes, maintain upkeep in a huge part of that easement, but in the end it's not really up to you how your property can be used. I understand all of that part, it's like the utilities that put up telephone poles in your yard, street maintenance, sidewalk maintenance, which the city owns the easements too. At times it doesn't seem quite right though, and I can understand why this has caused a furor with the fiber optic cable companies. I am a bit perplexed as to why the railroad companies weren't included in the case. I think there is some guilt that lies at their door for profiting and future profiting for an easement obtained for their original means of business.

I know a lot of people will read their pamphlet/booklets and think automatically they will become rich. In the settlement, they will be paid per foot for the easement used by the fiber optic companies. From there, things become a little more confusing. How much you will be paid will depend on what kind of "corridor" the railroad runs in that area, when and what kind of easement was obtained and a bunch of other gobbledygook for their basis of payment. It can run anywhere from 13 cents a foot to a couple of dollars. If you were a farmer with acres and acres you might see a considerable profit. I am guessing that most people will only see a fraction of what they hope for. In exchange for this settlement payment you will be giving the fiber optic cable companies a PERMANENT easement that can and will cover a significant distance. The exact distance I can't find listed as of yet.

I think that is what bothers me most. The cable company already has what they want. Their cable buried on private property. In the terms of the settlement, they will also have their own easement which they can then use as the railroad did to garner more profits from other companies for use of that easement. If you do nothing, the easement is AUTOMATICALLY theirs. Payment to you will be after several appeals down the road. By then the prices paid per foot could change, if they are paid at all. In order to not be a part of the settlement, you have to option out by sending in a letter with names, addresses, legal descriptions of the property, number of feet, give the case number, everything entailed in their booklet.

I think that is a lot to be expected of the owner of the property in question. I wonder how many property owners who are like my mother and hate messing with anything sounding legal and confusing. My mother has issues with just returning an item to the store. She hates hassle. Numerous times she will give me an item and receipt and ask me to return it for her. If I don't, it will end up being something stuck on a shelf, never used, and collecting dust.

Maybe I am wrong, but I have told her to option out of the settlement. It will require me typing up the letter for her, finding all the legal information, go walk off the property to gauge the amount of feet it involves and helping her to get it all situated and mailed off by the due date.

It makes me do a small burn when I think about it...

That little engine that had self doubts sure has grown up...now it thinks it really can do anything...

16 comments:

  1. By optioning out of the settlement and writing her letter, doesn't that tell the Cable company that they have no right to be on her property, and that they must remove their cable? Subsequently, if all the landowners did the same thing, would not the cable company have to remove it? I sure hope so. Like you, this kind of stuff really gets my goat.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yah know...that STINKS! Unreal, but not unbelievable, cuz big business always gets the profit! 13 cents a foot! Sheesh, that's ridiculous! And everything that make you go thru to get it. I say...join the suit, don't opt out, you may as well get SOMETHING.
    I would have thought the same what Suzi said. It doesn't sound like there's any option for them to GET THE CABLE OFF THE PROPERTY! Of course not! They're protected by being in the Railroads easement. Don't seem right at all!
    GREED!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think they should be made to go to court, When big companies try to settle out of court they are invariably in the wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wait...since possession is 9/10's of the law, I'd just go out, determine MY property lines, and then dig up the cable that is on MY property, and cut it into tiny little pieces...
    The lane that I live on is the same thing...the road runs through everyone's property, and there is an easement on either side of the road...so that we can all use it, BUT, the land still belongs to each property owner...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Vic, I look at my cable, internet and phone bill every month and just shake my head in disgust. I spend close to 250.00 for the 3 per month. I can't believe that any cables are run without consent of land owners without careful planning done by the companies that had them run. I could just imagine the board meetings and the hand shaking and pay offs given and studies made and legal advice given years in advance for these cables to be run. I am sure that every advantage that could be taken was taken and the owners of those companies and they are rolling in the wealth for what they did.
    Taking them to court and having a civil action suit will only profit the lawyers and the lawyers involved are probably already involved with the lawyers for the companies that the civil suit is against. It surely would be a no win situation after it's all over and done with for any land owner no matter how much property they own.I think your suggesting the right option for your mom. It's a sad world we live in and the little person is just being taken advantage of again.

    ReplyDelete
  6. mmm so agree with u- noteing word: gobbilygook also- adding to the morgtionary book of words

    ReplyDelete
  7. yup it's a shame ordinary folks always get the shaft....

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sounds like a lot of trouble to get out of this situation. But instead of doing all the work why don't you look at the abstract and find out how much footage is on that easement? But then too the abstract may not be on hand so go buy yourself a long tape and don't forget a notepad and pencil.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Sounds like time to have a little "accident" along the easement and slice some cables.....if ALL the property owners did this.I bet the cable companies would be a bit more generous in their offers.....

    ReplyDelete
  10. From experience-- RR easements are still owned by the RR unless there has been a transfer of the property.Even if they dispose of the property it is usually given to a city or something and very rarely to the connecting property owners. The only one getting anything will be the lawyers or other government agencys. Yep, as Wanda and Dixie says the little guy will get screwed. We had that situation once and now the city has what they call Railroad Park on that tiny little strip Good Luck what ever ya do

    ReplyDelete
  11. Boy this rubs me the wrong way. There are always going to be people out there finding ways to get around things and beating any system. At our old house our easement was at the back of the property...not the front so when we wanted to put our pool in we had to build it sideways..If lengthwise it would have gone over that easement which belongs to the city...They could have come along and made us remove the pool. Now why the heck??? The idea of that easement was if the city just might like to have built a road thru???? or whatever. Yet our fence sat on it...Go figure.
    We had a railroad line down at the bay with home owners on one side and then the line and then the water/cottages/boathouse/docks owned by the home owners. Well the railroad pulled up stakes took out the rails and the city bought up that strip..City turned it into a walking path...The whole line thru town. Some of that property on the water is leased by the city with a 99 year lease..Well a lot of them are coming due and the city is thinking of not renewing those leases. They say they want to clean up the waterfront...Hah! So that water property owned/leased by homeowners won't get them back. All because the railroad went originally thru home owners property way back when. It's like what joy6344 said.

    ReplyDelete
  12. By the way, we had to pay them something like 25 bux a year to use the land for parking and mow it and all that shit. Scrounges. We offered to buy it and no deal. We could not get to the back of the property with out the lease we had on what was really ours anyway. Enough of what has been over for 25 or so years.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yep, I hate this kind of crap. Did I miss it? Is anybody doing anything to the raliroad for doing it in the first place. You also said the cable was in the ground so it's too late. They could be told to rip it out I would think. You do something illegal in plumbing and you rip it out. That's what get's me. They think because it's there they have it made. The only people really gonna make out this way is the lawyers.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I hear ya, I live on a corner lot and the city gets me every year with more easement expenses and I have had a 18% increase in my taxes over the last two years. And I am responsible to mow the boulevard they own or they will come do it and charge me. I have been thinking about putting lawn killer on it and just leaving the dirt.

    What would happen if you ignored the settlement? I bet you would never hear from them again. Sometimes if you don't respond they can't do anything for years and it usually gets swept under the carpet and becomes a mute point if few respond.

    ReplyDelete
  15. That's darn right sneaky but not new. We home and land owners get tricked in as many ways as possible.

    ReplyDelete